AC vs DC Magnetization in Magnetic Particle Inspection (MPI): What You Really Need to Know

Table of Contents

Magnetic Particle Inspection (MPI) is widely used to detect surface and near-surface defects in ferromagnetic materials such as pipes, shafts, forgings, and welded components.
However, when selecting an MPI system, one technical factor is often misunderstood or overlooked: the difference between AC and DC magnetization.

In practice, this difference directly affects inspection sensitivity, application range, and even equipment pricing. This article explains AC and DC magnetization in a practical, application-oriented way.


What Is Magnetization in Magnetic Particle Inspection?

MPI works by magnetizing a component so that discontinuities interrupt the magnetic field and create leakage flux. Magnetic particles are then attracted to these leakage fields, forming visible indications.

To detect different flaw orientations, MPI systems usually apply:

  • Circumferential magnetization (for longitudinal defects)

  • Longitudinal magnetization (for transverse defects)

The type of current used for magnetization—AC or DC—determines how effectively these flaws can be revealed.


AC Magnetization: Characteristics and Applications

Alternating Current (AC) magnetization produces a magnetic field that constantly changes direction. Due to the skin effect, AC magnetization is concentrated near the surface of the material.

Key features of AC magnetization:

  • High sensitivity to surface defects

  • Ideal for fine cracks, laps, and seams

  • Commonly used for circumferential magnetization

  • Typically lower equipment cost

Limitations:

  • Limited penetration depth

  • Not suitable for detecting subsurface flaws

AC magnetization is widely used in applications where surface-breaking defects are the primary concern.


DC Magnetization: Characteristics and Applications

Direct Current (DC) magnetization creates a steady magnetic field that penetrates deeper into the material. It can be generated as true DC or via rectified current.

Key features of DC magnetization:

  • Capable of detecting subsurface and near-surface defects

  • Stronger and more stable magnetic field

  • Commonly used for longitudinal magnetization

  • Essential for thick-wall or large cross-section components

Considerations:

  • More complex power supply

  • Higher equipment cost compared to AC-only systems

In many industrial standards, DC magnetization is mandatory for reliable detection of internal or angled defects.


Circumferential vs Longitudinal Magnetization Explained

To achieve full coverage, MPI systems often combine both magnetization directions:

  • Circumferential magnetization
    Usually generated by passing current through the part to detect longitudinal defects.

  • Longitudinal magnetization
    Typically produced using coils or yokes to detect transverse defects.

In practical inspection, the effectiveness of these magnetization methods depends heavily on whether AC or DC is used.


AC vs DC Magnetization: Practical Differences That Matter

Aspect AC Magnetization DC Magnetization
Defect depth Surface only Surface + subsurface
Field stability Alternating Steady
Penetration Shallow Deep
Typical use Fine surface cracks Internal or angled flaws
Equipment complexity Lower Higher

These differences explain why two MPI machines with similar current ratings can perform very differently in real inspections.


Why Some MPI Machines Are Cheaper Than Others

In many quotations, the magnetization type is not clearly stated—only current ranges are listed.
This often indicates:

  • AC-only magnetization

  • Simplified or non-true DC output

  • Reduced inspection capability

Machines configured with true AC/DC magnetization offer broader application coverage and higher inspection reliability, which naturally affects cost.


How to Choose the Right Magnetization Configuration

When selecting an MPI system, consider:

  • Material thickness and geometry

  • Required defect sensitivity

  • Applicable inspection standards

  • Existing inspection procedures

If your inspection requires both surface and subsurface flaw detection, AC/DC capability is not an option—it is a necessity.


Conclusion

Understanding the difference between AC and DC magnetization is essential when evaluating MPI equipment.
While AC magnetization is effective for surface inspection, DC magnetization provides deeper detection capability and greater inspection confidence.

Choosing the right configuration ensures consistent results, compliance with inspection requirements, and long-term inspection reliability.

If you still don’t know how to choose the best solutions, contact us right now.

Author picture

Hi, I’m the author of this post. With over 10 years of experience in non-destructive testing (NDT) equipment manufacturing, we have served 70+ clients across 15+ countries with high-quality flaw detection solutions.
Our main products include magnetic particle inspection machines, penetrant testing lines, demagnetizers, and related accessories, widely used in aerospace, automotive, shipbuilding, petrochemical, and metallurgy industries.
Need reliable NDT equipment for your production line? Contact us now for a free quote and get your one-stop testing solution.

Welcome To Share This Page:
Product Categories
Latest News
Get A Free Quote Now !
Contact Form Demo (#3)

Related Products

Related News

Gears, shafts, and racks are critical components used in automotive, machinery, and heavy equipment industries. Because they bear high loads

Magnetic Particle Inspection (MPI) is widely used to detect surface and near-surface defects in ferromagnetic materials such as pipes, shafts,

OCTG Pipe End Inspection Using Magnetic Particle Testing In the oil and gas industry, Oil Country Tubular Goods (OCTG) such

Introduction Fluorescent Penetrant Inspection (FPI) lines are essential for ensuring the surface quality of metal components in industries such as

Fluorescent Penetrant Inspection (FPI), also known as Penetrant Testing, is a critical non-destructive testing (NDT) method used to detect surface

Fluorescent Penetrant Inspection (FPI) is one of the most sensitive surface open-defect detection methods in non-destructive testing (NDT). It reliably

1. Introduction Railway systems operate under extreme conditions: high speeds, heavy loads, and decades of service. Structural integrity of critical

Magnetic Particle Inspection (MPI) is one of the most reliable NDT methods for detecting surface and near-surface defects in ferromagnetic

Scroll to Top

Get A Free Quote Now !

Contact Form Demo (#3)
If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contatct with us.